State Of Georgia v. Mark Randall Meadows ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Supreme Court
    State of Georgia, Respondent,
    v.
    Mark Randall Meadows, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2022-001604
    Appeal From Pickens County
    The Honorable Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
    Memorandum Opinion No. 2022-MO-010
    Submitted November 17, 2022 – Filed November 29, 2022
    AFFIRMED
    James W. Bannister, of Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey,
    LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
    Andrew John Savage, III, of Savage Law Firm, and
    Christopher W. Adams, of Adams Bischoff LLC, both of
    Charleston, for Respondent.
    Costa M. Pleicones, William C. McKinney, and
    Jonathan D. Klett, all of Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A.,
    of Greenville, for Amici Curiae Current and Former
    Prosecutors.
    PER CURIAM: Pursuant to the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of
    Witnesses from Without a State in a Criminal Proceeding,1 a South Carolina circuit
    court ordered Appellant to appear and testify, on November 30, 2022, before a
    Special Purpose Grand Jury empaneled in Fulton County, Georgia, to investigate
    allegations of possible attempts to disrupt the lawful administration of the
    November 2020 elections in Georgia.
    Appellant appealed the order of the circuit court and filed a motion to certify the
    appeal to this Court, arguing the merits of his appeal in his motion. We granted the
    motion to certify the appeal and, because of the exigent circumstances involved in
    the matter, requested a response from the State of Georgia to the arguments
    presented by Appellant in the motion to certify.
    We have reviewed the arguments raised by Appellant and find them to be
    manifestly without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the circuit court
    pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR.
    AFFIRMED.
    BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
    1
    Both South Carolina and Georgia have adopted the Act. See 
    S.C. Code Ann. §§ 19-9-10
     to -130 (2014); 
    Ga. Code Ann. §§ 24-13-90
     to -97 (2013).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2022-MO-010

Filed Date: 11/29/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2024