Cox v. Cox , 27 S.C. Eq. 275 ( 1854 )

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion, that, without considering or approving any other ground, the plaintiff’s right to a decree was barred by the statute of limitations, which began to run against the alleged fraud from the defendant’s purchase ; (see Thrower vs. Cureton, 4 Strob. Eq. 155, and McDonald vs. May, 1 Rich. Eq., 91), and that the bill was rightly dismissed.

JohnstoN, Dunkin, Dargan and Wardi,aw, CC., concurring.

Appeal dismissed.