Chiles v. Holloway , 15 S.C.L. 164 ( 1827 )

Waties, J.

who heard the case dismissed the rule.— He thought the sheriff had no authority to receive the-money but what he derived from the execution, and that a payment made to the deputy before the sheriff himself' was authorised to receive it,, could not-render the sheriff Hable. The party paying must look to the deputy.

The Court of Appeals confirmed his honor’s judgment.

Rule dismissedl.