Harris v. McNinch , 44 S.C.L. 35 ( 1856 )


Menu:
  • Pee CuriAM.

    In this case we concur in the ruling of the Judge below, and find nothing in the verdict of the jury which appears to us to be erroneous.

    The motion is dismissed.

    O’Neall, Wardlaw, Withers, Whitner, Glover, and MuNRO, JJ., concurring.

    Motion dismissed.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 44 S.C.L. 35

Judges: Glover, Munro, Neall, Pee, Wardlaw, Whitner, Withers

Filed Date: 12/15/1856

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024