Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Wilson ( 2019 )

II. REMAINING ISSUES

Based on our finding Quicken did not violate the attorney preference statute, we decline to address its remaining arguments.

**582See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613, 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (stating an appellate court need not address remaining issues when a decision on a prior issue is dispositive).

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, the order on appeal is

REVERSED.

HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.