State v. Joshua T. Rothwell ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    The State, Respondent,
    v.
    Joshua Thomas Rothwell, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2020-001444
    Appeal From Florence County
    D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-045
    Submitted January 1, 2023 – Filed February 1, 2023
    APPEAL DISMISSED
    Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
    Appellant.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
    Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
    Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
    APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
    KONDUROS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2023-UP-045

Filed Date: 2/1/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024