Landry v. Landry ( 2019 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Michael Landry, Appellant,
v.
Angela Landry, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001357
Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-047
Submitted November 1, 2018 – Filed January 30, 2019
AFFIRMED
Rhett D. Burney, of Turner and Burney, PC, of
Simpsonville, for Appellant.
Larry Keith Wood, of Larry K. Wood, PA, of Mauldin,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Stoney v. Stoney, 422 S.C. 593, 594 n.2, 813 S.E.2d 486, 486 n.2
(2018) (noting appellate courts review "a family court's evidentiary or procedural
rulings . . . using an abuse of discretion standard"); Ware v. Ware, 404 S.C. 1, 10,
743 S.E.2d 817, 822 (2013) ("An abuse of discretion occurs when the order of the
court is controlled by an error of law or whe[n] the order is based on factual
findings that are without evidentiary support."); Rule 60(a), SCRCP ("Clerical
mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record and errors therein arising
from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time of its own
initiative or on the motion of any party and after such notice, if any, as the court
orders."); Clark v. Clark, 423 S.C. 596, 610, 815 S.E.2d 772, 779 (Ct. App. 2018)
("The family court's correction of clerical errors may not extend to 'chang[ing] the
scope of the judgment.'" (alteration in original) (quoting Brown v. Brown, 392 S.C.
615, 622, 709 S.E.2d 679, 683 (Ct. App. 2011))).
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.