State v. Michael Thomas Dyer ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    The State, Respondent,
    v.
    Michael Thomas Dyer, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2021-000680
    Appeal From Lexington County
    Walton J. McLeod, IV, Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-093
    Submitted January 1, 2023 – Filed March 15, 2023
    APPEAL DISMISSED
    Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, for Appellant.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
    Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
    Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
    review pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967). Counsel's motion to
    be relieved is granted.
    APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
    WILLIAMS, C.J., THOMAS, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J.
    1
    We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2023-UP-093

Filed Date: 3/15/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024