State v. Perkins ( 2019 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jamal B. Perkins, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000086
Appeal From Chester County
Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-006
Submitted November 1, 2018 – Filed January 4, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, and Appellate
Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, both of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Matthew C.
Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, both of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.