State v. Chiles ( 2011 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Chiles, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Spartanburg County
J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-336  
Submitted June 1, 2011 – Filed June 28, 2011

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and  Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Kenneth Chiles appeals his conviction for armed robbery, arguing the circuit court erred in allowing several in-court eyewitness identifications of him.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and KONDUROS, JJ., concur. 

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.