Edward Hills v. Dean, USC ( 2023 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Edward Tyrone Hills, Appellant, v. Dean, University of South Carolina, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2022-001512 Appeal From Richland County DeAndrea G. Benjamin, Circuit Court Judge Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-303 Submitted August 23, 2023 – Filed August 30, 2023 AFFIRMED Edward Tyrone Hills, pro se. Monteith Powell Todd and Rachel Moore Hutchens, both of Robinson Gray Stepp & Laffitte, LLC, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Edward Tyrone Hills contends the circuit erred when it rejected his argument that the defendant in this case was in default. We respectfully disagree. The defendant's first filing with the circuit court was a motion seeking dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. That rule allows the moving party to file such a motion before filing an answer. There is no dispute the defendant's filing was proper under the rules. Thus, the circuit court correctly held the defendant was not in default. Hills does not challenge the correctness of the later order granting the motion to dismiss (beyond arguing that the defendant was in default). Therefore, the judgment in the defendant's favor is AFFIRMED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and HEWITT and VERDIN, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. The pending motion to expedite this case is dismissed as moot.