State v. Whitehurst ( 2010 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Don Ray Whitehurst, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Spartanburg County
Gordon G. Cooper, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-459
Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed October 21, 2010 

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

 Appellate Defender Kathrine Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Don Ray Whitehurst appeals his probation revocation, arguing the revocation court abused its discretion.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.