Mack v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    John Willie Mack, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    State of South Carolina, Respondent.
    Appellate Case No. 2017-001570
    Appeal From Spartanburg County
    Robin B. Stilwell, Trial Judge
    J. Derham Cole, DNA Court Judge
    Robin B. Stilwell, PCR Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-386
    Submitted October 1, 2019 – Filed December 18, 2019
    AFFIRMED
    Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for
    Petitioner.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior
    Assistant Deputy Attorney General Megan Harrigan
    Jameson, and Assistant Attorney General Johnny Ellis
    James, Jr., all of Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
    authorities: 
    S.C. Code Ann. § 17-28-60
     (2014) ("The performance of counsel
    pursuant to this article shall not form the basis for relief in any post-conviction
    relief proceeding."); State v. Jacobs, 
    393 S.C. 584
    , 587, 
    713 S.E.2d 621
    , 622
    (2011) ("[A] court must abide by the plain meaning of the words of a statute.").
    AFFIRMED.1
    LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2019-UP-386

Filed Date: 12/18/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024