HomEq Servicing v. Napier ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
    NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
    PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    HomEq Servicing Corporation
    f/k/a TMS Mortgage, Inc. d/b/a
    The Money Store,                 Respondent,
    v.
    Jeanette B. Napier, Dale W.
    Phillips, NationsCredit
    Financial Services Corporation
    d/b/a EquiCredit, Chisolm
    Green Property Homeowners
    Association, Inc.,               Defendants,
    of whom Jeanette B. Napier is
    the                              Appellant.
    __________
    Appeal From Charleston County
    Mikell R. Scarborough, Master-In-Equity
    __________
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-405
    Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed July 11, 2012
    __________
    REMANDED
    __________
    Jeanette B. Napier, of Johns Island, pro se.
    Weston Adams, III and Helen Hiser, both of
    Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Jeanette Napier appeals the master-in-equity's order
    and judgment of foreclosure, arguing the master erred in (1) refusing to grant
    Napier's motion for a continuance, (2) calculating several fees and deficits in
    amending an earlier judgment against Napier, and (3) failing to reconsider its
    order. We remand.1
    We remand to the master for consideration of Napier's post-trial
    motion. See Rule 59(e), SCRCP ("A motion to alter or amend the judgment
    shall be served not later than 10 days after receipt of written notice of the
    entry of the order."); Rule 5(e), SCRCP ("The filing of pleadings and other
    papers with the court as required by these rules shall be made by filing them
    with the clerk of the court, except that the judge may permit the papers to be
    filed with him, in which event he shall note thereon the filing date and
    forthwith transmit them to the office of the clerk."); Rule 59(g), SCRCP ("A
    party filing a written motion under this rule shall provide a copy of the
    motion to the judge within ten (10) days after the filing of the motion.").2
    REMANDED.
    PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    2
    In light of our disposition herein, we decline to address Napier's remaining
    arguments. See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 
    335 S.C. 598
    , 613, 
    518 S.E.2d 591
    , 598 (1999) (providing an appellate court need not
    address all issues on appeal when the disposition of one issue is dispositive).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2012-UP-405

Filed Date: 7/11/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024