Stutler v. SC Farm Bureau ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    Jeff Stutler, Appellant,
    v.
    South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
    d/b/a South Carolina Farm Bureau Insurance Companies,
    Dillon County Fire Department, and Bobby Lee
    Thompson, Defendants,
    Of whom Dillon County Fire Department and Bobby Lee
    Thompson are Respondents.
    Appellate Case No. 2010-179649
    Appeal From Dillon County
    Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-529
    Submitted August 1, 2012 – Filed September 19, 2012
    AFFIRMED
    Daniel Nathan Hughey, of Hughey Law Firm, LLC, of
    Mount Pleasant, for Appellant.
    C. Heath Ruffner, of Harris, McLeod & Ruffner, of
    Cheraw, for Respondent Dillon County Fire Department.
    Andrew F. Lindemann and Daniel C. Plyler, both of
    Davidson & Lindemann, P.A., of Columbia, for
    Respondent Bobby Lee Thompson.
    PER CURIAM: Affirmed1 pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
    authorities: Williams v. Watkins, 
    384 S.C. 319
    , 324, 
    681 S.E.2d 914
    , 916 (Ct. App.
    2009) ("Relief under Rule 60(b)(1), SCRCP, lies within the sound discretion of the
    [trial judge] and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion."
    (internal quotation marks omitted)); 
    id.
     ("An abuse of discretion arises where the
    judgment is controlled by an error of law or is based on factual conclusions that are
    without evidentiary support."); Paul Davis Sys., Inc. v. Deepwater of Hilton Head,
    LLC, 
    362 S.C. 220
    , 225, 
    607 S.E.2d 358
    , 360-61 (Ct. App. 2004) ("It is incumbent
    upon the party seeking relief pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1) to show the applicability of
    one of the qualifying grounds [of mistake or inadvertence].").
    AFFIRMED.
    HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2012-UP-529

Filed Date: 9/19/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024