State v. Crump ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    The State, Respondent,
    v.
    William Sidney Crump, Jr., Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2018-001607
    Appeal From Greenwood County
    Jocelyn Newman, Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-116
    Submitted March 1, 2020 – Filed April 29, 2020
    APPEAL DISMISSED
    Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
    Columbia, for Appellant.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
    Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
    Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    HUFF, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2020-UP-116

Filed Date: 4/29/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024