State v. Donald D. Smith ( 2023 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Donald Dayquan Smith, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2021-000579
Appeal From Florence County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Michael S. Holt, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-359
Submitted October 1, 2023 – Filed November 8, 2023
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
WILLIAMS, C.J., and HEWITT and VERDIN, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.