State v. Christopher L. Briggs ( 2023 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Christopher Lee Briggs, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2021-001501
Appeal From Florence County
William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-356
Submitted October 1, 2023 – Filed November 8, 2023
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia, and Christopher Lee Briggs, pro se, both for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
WILLIAMS, C.J., and HEWITT and VERDIN, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.