State v. Brannon ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    The State, Respondent,
    v.
    Nikki Auduan Brannon, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2011-193447
    Appeal From Spartanburg County
    Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-006
    Submitted December 3, 2012 – Filed January 9, 2013
    APPEAL DISMISSED
    Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
    Appellant.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
    Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior
    Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
    of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry Barnette, of
    Spartanburg, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
    review pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967). Counsel's motion to
    be relieved is granted.
    APPEAL DISMISSED.1
    FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2013-UP-006

Filed Date: 1/9/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024