State v. Breeland ( 2013 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Marquis Breeland, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2011-197633
Appeal From Allendale County
William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-073
Heard December 11, 2012 – Filed February 13, 2013
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, Assistant Attorney
General Alphonso Simon, Jr., all of Columbia, and
Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of Bluffton, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Marquis Breeland appeals his convictions for murder and
possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, arguing the trial
court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict because the evidence
adduced at trial did not amount to more than a mere suspicion that he was guilty of
shooting the victim. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the
following authorities: State v. Brandt, 393 S.C. 526, 542, 713 S.E.2d 591, 599
(2011) ("If there is any direct evidence or any substantial circumstantial evidence
reasonably tending to prove the guilt of the accused, the [c]ourt must find the case
was properly submitted to the jury." (quoting State v. Weston, 367 S.C. 279, 292-
93, 625 S.E.2d 641, 648 (2006))); id. ("When reviewing a denial of a directed
verdict, an appellate court views the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the
light most favorable to the State."); State v. Cherry, 361 S.C. 588, 593, 606 S.E.2d
475, 477-78 (2004) (providing that when considering a directed verdict motion, the
trial court is concerned with the existence of evidence rather than its weight); id. at
594, 606 S.E.2d at 478 ("[A] trial judge is not required to find that the evidence
infers guilt to the exclusion of any other reasonable hypothesis."); State v. Gaster,
349 S.C. 545, 555, 564 S.E.2d 87, 92 (2002) ("On an appeal from the trial court's
denial of a motion for a directed verdict, the appellate court may only reverse the
trial court if there is no evidence to support the trial court's ruling.").
AFFIRMED.
SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.