In the Interest of Keith W. ( 2011 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Keith W.,

A minor under the age of seventeen, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Cherokee County
Wesley L. Brown, Family Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-324
Submitted June 1, 2011 – Filed June 22, 2011   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Eleanor Cleary Duffy, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keith W. appeals his conviction for indecent exposure, arguing the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a directed verdict.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., LOCMEKY, J., and GOOLSBY, AJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.