State v. Cantrell ( 2011 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Dean Cantrell, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Anderson County
J.C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-311
Submitted June 1, 2011 – Filed June 20, 2011

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  James Dean Cantrell appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his probation because his failure to complete a recommended drug treatment program was the result of a misunderstanding.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

FEW, C.J., PIEPER and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.