State v. Roger ( 2011 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jarvis Roper, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Charleston County
Roger M. Young, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-257
Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed June 1, 2011   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jarvis Roper appeals his sentences, arguing the circuit court relied on unsubstantiated facts outside the scope of his plea agreement.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., KONDUROS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur. 

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.