SCDSS v. Edwards ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    South Carolina Department of Social Services,
    Respondent,
    v.
    Misty Dawn Bramlett Edwards and Chad Ledford
    Edwards, Appellants.
    In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
    Appellate Case No. 2019-001082
    Appeal From Oconee County
    Tommy B. Edwards, Family Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-318
    Submitted November 17, 2020 – Filed November 20, 2020
    AFFIRMED
    Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
    Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellants.
    Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
    Steven Luther Alexander, of Alexander Law Firm, LLC,
    of Pickens, for the Guardian ad Litem.
    PER CURIAM: Misty Dawn Bramlett Edwards and Chad Ledford Edwards
    appeal the family court's final order terminating their parental rights to their minor
    children. See 
    S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
     (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review
    of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law
    pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 
    291 S.C. 465
    , 
    354 S.E.2d 381
     (1987), we find no
    meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's
    ruling and relieve the Edwards' counsel.
    AFFIRMED.1
    LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2020-UP-318

Filed Date: 11/20/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024