State v. Young ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    The State, Respondent,
    v.
    Da Juan Rayshard Young, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2021-001349
    Appeal From Greenville County
    Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-142
    Submitted April 1, 2024 – Filed May 1, 2024
    APPEAL DISMISSED
    Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for
    Appellant.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
    Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing,
    both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins,
    III, of Greenville, all for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
    APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
    THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2024-UP-142

Filed Date: 5/1/2024

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024