Fenollol Group v. Banister ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals

    The Fenollol Group, Inc., Respondent,

    v.

    Beasley Jo Banister and Samuel Banister d/b/a Hilltop Diner, Appellants.


    Appeal From Fairfield County
    Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge


    Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-535
    Submitted December 1, 2010 – Filed December 14, 2010


    AFFIRMED


    Creighton B. Coleman, of Winnsboro, for Appellants.

    William Lee Duda, of Columbia, for Respondent.

    PER CURIAM: Appellants appeals from the trial court's grant of a temporary injunction.   We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. First Carolina Corp. of S.C., 372 S.C. 295,301-02, 641 S.E.2d 903, 907 (2007) (issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court will not be considered on appeal). 

    AFFIRMED.[1]

    THOMAS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


    [1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-UP-535

Filed Date: 12/14/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024