State v. Alford ( 2013 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Timothy Wayne Alford, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-211997
Appeal From York County
Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-353
Submitted August 1, 2013 – Filed September 11, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Assistant Attorney General James Rutledge Johnson, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.