State v. Crout ( 2011 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Raymond Buck Crout, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Richland County
L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-027
Submitted January 1, 2011 – Filed January 25, 2011

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Raymond Buck Crout appeals his probation revocation.  Crout argues the probation revocation court could not revoke his probation because he had satisfied his original sentence when the Department of Corrections closed his case for the community supervision program.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Crout's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.