Bowie v. Woodbine Estates ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    Patrick Bowie, Respondent,
    v.
    Woodbine Estates, LLC, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2013-001064
    Appeal From Abbeville County
    Eugene C. Griffith, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-393
    Submitted September 1, 2014 – Filed November 12, 2014
    AFFIRMED
    Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., of Law Firm of Fletcher N. Smith,
    Jr., LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
    Robert Jamison Tinsley, Jr., of Greenwood, for
    Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
    authorities: S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. M & T Enters. of Mt. Pleasant, 
    379 S.C. 645
    ,
    658, 
    667 S.E.2d 7
    , 14 (Ct. App. 2008) ("It is well settled that an issue must have
    been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate
    review."); I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant, 
    338 S.C. 406
    , 422, 
    526 S.E.2d 716
    , 724 (2000) ("The losing party must first try to convince the [trial] court it . . .
    has ruled wrongly and then, if that effort fails, convince the appellate court that the
    [trial] court erred. This principle underlies the long-established preservation
    requirement that the losing party generally must both present his issues and
    arguments to the [trial] court and obtain a ruling before an appellate court will
    review those issues and arguments.").
    AFFIRMED.1
    FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2014-UP-393

Filed Date: 11/12/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024