Wells Fargo Bank v. Smalley ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for WaMu Mortgage
    Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-PR I Trust,
    Respondent,
    v.
    Marvin Smalley and Bay Club Homes Property Owners
    Association, Inc., Defendants,
    Of whom Marvin Smalley is the Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2013-002175
    Appeal From Charleston County
    Mikell R. Scarborough, Master-in-Equity
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-134
    Submitted February 1, 2015 – Filed March 11, 2015
    AFFIRMED
    David K. Haller, of Haller Law Firm, of Charleston, for
    Appellant.
    Benjamin Rush Smith, III and Michael J. Anzelmo, both
    of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of
    Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
    authorities: Hayne Fed. Credit Union v. Bailey, 
    327 S.C. 242
    , 248, 
    489 S.E.2d 472
    , 475 (1997) ("A mortgage foreclosure is an action in equity."); 
    id.
     ("Our scope
    of review of a case heard by a master who enters a final judgment is to determine
    facts in accordance with our own view of the preponderance of the evidence.");
    Sloan v. Greenville Cnty., 
    356 S.C. 531
    , 546, 
    590 S.E.2d 338
    , 346 (Ct. App. 2003)
    ("A legal question in an equity case receives review as in law."); U.S. Bank Trust
    Nat'l Ass'n v. Bell, 
    385 S.C. 364
    , 373, 
    684 S.E.2d 199
    , 204 (Ct. App. 2009)
    ("Because questions of law may be decided with no particular deference to the trial
    court, this court may correct errors of law in both legal and equitable actions."); 
    id. at 374
    , 684 S.E.2d at 204 ("A mortgage and a note are separate securities for the
    same debt, and a mortgagee who has a note and a mortgage to secure a debt has the
    option to either bring an action on the note or to pursue a foreclosure action."); id.
    at 374-75, 684 S.E.2d at 205 ("Generally, the party seeking foreclosure has the
    burden of establishing the existence of the debt and the mortgagor's default on that
    debt."); id. at 375, 684 S.E.2d at 205 ("Once the debt and default have been
    established, the mortgagor has the burden of establishing a defense to foreclosure
    such as lack of consideration, payment, or accord and satisfaction.").
    AFFIRMED.1
    THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2015-UP-134

Filed Date: 3/11/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024