State v. Matheny ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    The State, Respondent,
    v.
    Randall Dean Matheny, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2013-001924
    Appeal From Spartanburg County
    Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-130
    Submitted January 1, 2015 – Filed March 11, 2015
    AFFIRMED
    Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia,
    for Appellant.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
    Attorney General Christina Catoe Bigelow, both of
    Columbia; and Solicitor Barry Joe Barnette, of
    Spartanburg, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
    authorities: State v. Gilmore, 
    396 S.C. 72
    , 77, 
    719 S.E.2d 688
    , 690 (Ct. App. 2011)
    ("[I]n the context of a trial court's decision not to charge a requested lesser-
    included offense, we review the trial court's decision de novo."); Sheppard v. State,
    
    357 S.C. 646
    , 665, 
    594 S.E.2d 462
    , 472 (2004) ("In general, the trial court is
    required to charge only the current and correct law of South Carolina."); State v.
    Hill, 
    315 S.C. 260
    , 262, 
    433 S.E.2d 848
    , 849 (1993) ("The law to be charged to the
    jury is determined by the evidence presented at trial."); State v. Geiger, 
    370 S.C. 600
    , 607, 
    635 S.E.2d 669
    , 673 (Ct. App. 2006) ("The trial court should refuse to
    charge the lesser[-]included offense when there has been no evidence tending to
    show the defendant may have committed solely the lesser offense."); State v.
    Dunbar, 
    356 S.C. 138
    , 142, 
    587 S.E.2d 691
    , 693 (2003) ("In order for an issue to
    be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by
    the trial [court]."); State v. Brockmeyer, 
    406 S.C. 324
    , 355, 
    751 S.E.2d 645
    , 661
    (2013) ("[A] party may not argue one ground at trial and another on appeal . . . .").
    AFFIRMED.1
    HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2015-UP-130

Filed Date: 3/11/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024