Message
×
loading..

State v. Neal ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    The State, Respondent,
    v.
    William Russell Neal, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2013-000465
    Appeal From Newberry County
    Eugene C. Griffith, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-207
    Submitted July 1, 2014 – Filed April 22, 2015
    APPEAL DISMISSED
    Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
    Appellant.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
    Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
    both of Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2015-UP-207

Filed Date: 4/22/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024