SCDSS v. Jackie Bragg ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    South Carolina Department of Social Services,
    Respondent,
    v.
    Jackie Bragg and Matthew Bragg, Defendants,
    Of whom Jackie Bragg is the Appellant.
    In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
    Appellate Case No. 2020-001598
    Appeal From Oconee County
    Karen F. Ballenger, Family Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-444
    Submitted December 9, 2021 – Filed December 13, 2021
    AFFIRMED
    Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
    Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.
    Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
    Kimberly Welchel Pease, of Seneca, for the Guardian ad
    Litem.
    PER CURIAM: Jackie Bragg appeals the family court's final order terminating
    her parental rights to her minor children. See 
    S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
     (Supp.
    2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
    fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 
    291 S.C. 465
    , 
    354 S.E.2d 381
     (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
    we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Bragg's counsel.
    AFFIRMED. 1
    KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2021-UP-444

Filed Date: 12/13/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024