SCDSS v. Cook ( 2021 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Ashton L. Black - deceased, Charles N. Dunn, and
Joshua Cook, Defendants,
Of whom Joshua Cook is the Appellant
and Ashton L. Black - deceased and Charles N. Dunn are
Respondents.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2021-000495
Appeal From Oconee County
Karen F. Ballenger, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-441
Submitted December 2, 2021 – Filed December 9, 2021
AFFIRMED
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Thomas Harper Collins, of Harper Collins LLC, of
Anderson, for Respondent Ashton Black.
Ashley Phillips Case, of Fountain Inn, and Andrew Troy
Potter, of Anderson, both for Respondent South Carolina
Department of Social Services.
Kimberly Welchel Pease, of Seneca, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Joshua Cook appeals the family court's final order terminating
his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Cook's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.