State v. Raiden ( 2015 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Rufus Raiden, III, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000215
Appeal From Pickens County
G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-261
Submitted March 1, 2015 – Filed May 20, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia; and Rufus Raiden, III, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III,
of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.