State v. Godbolt ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    The State, Respondent,
    v.
    Reco Antonio Godbolt, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2013-000456
    Appeal From Sumter County
    George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-229
    Submitted February 1, 2015 – Filed May 6, 2015
    APPEAL DISMISSED
    Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia;
    and Reco Antonio Godbolt, pro se, for Appellant.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
    Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
    both of Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
    review pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967). Counsel's motion to
    be relieved is granted.1
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2015-UP-229

Filed Date: 5/6/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024