Burton v. Lexington County Solicitor ( 2022 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Charles F. Burton, Appellant,
v.
Lexington County Solicitor, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001252
Appeal From Lexington County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-012
Submitted November 1, 2021 – Filed January 12, 2022
AFFIRMED
Charles Thomas Brooks, III, of The Law Office of
Charles T. Brooks, III, of Sumter, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Harley Littleton Kirkland, both of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Charles F. Burton appeals the circuit court's grant of summary
judgment in favor of the Lexington County Solicitor in Burton's action for an
expungement. On appeal, Burton argues the circuit court erred in finding no
genuine issues of material fact existed. We find this argument is unpreserved for
appellate review because Burton conceded at the summary judgment hearing that
no facts were in dispute. Accordingly, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b),
SCACR, and the following authorities: Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76, 497
S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) ("It is axiomatic that an issue cannot be raised for the first
time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the [circuit court]
to be preserved for appellate review."); TNS Mills, Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of Revenue,
331 S.C. 611, 617, 503 S.E.2d 471, 474 (1998) ("An issue conceded in a lower
court may not be argued on appeal."); State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587
S.E.2d 691, 694 (2003) ("A party may not argue one ground at trial and an
alternate ground on appeal.").
AFFIRMED.1
KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.