State v. McKever ( 2016 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Austen Syntell McKever, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002707
Appeal From Florence County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-060
Submitted December 1, 2015 – Filed February 17, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Tiffany Lorraine Butler, of
Columbia; and Austen Syntell McKever, pro se, for
Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the Department of Probation,
Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.