National Security Fire & Casualty v. Jenrette ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    National Security Fire & Casualty Company, Plaintiff,
    v.
    Rosemary Jenrette, AKA Rosemary Long Jenrette, and
    Horry County State Bank, Defendants,
    Of whom
    Rosemary Jenrette, AKA Rosemary Long Jenrette, is the
    Appellant,
    and
    Horry County State Bank is the Respondent.
    Appellate Case No. 2014-001285
    Appeal From Horry County
    George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-067
    Heard January 14, 2016 – Filed February 17, 2016
    AFFIRMED
    William W. DesChamps, Jr. and William W.
    DesChamps, III, both of DesChamps Law Firm, of
    Myrtle Beach, for Appellant.
    Randall K. Mullins and Jarrod E. Ownbey, both of
    Mullins Law Firm, PA, of North Myrtle Beach, for
    Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: In this interpleader action, Rosemary Jenrette appeals the trial
    court's order awarding insurance proceeds to Horry County State Bank (the Bank).
    Jenrette argues the trial court erred in finding (1) the existence of an equitable lien
    in favor of the Bank on the insurance proceeds; (2) she was bound by a covenant in
    the mortgage to insure the subject property; and (3) the assignment provision in the
    subject mortgage survived the cancellation of the mortgage. We affirm pursuant to
    Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Fibkins v. Fibkins, 
    303 S.C. 112
    , 115, 
    399 S.E.2d 158
    , 160 (Ct. App. 1990) ("An action to establish an
    equitable lien is an action in equity."); Townes Assocs., Ltd. v. City of Greenville,
    
    266 S.C. 81
    , 86, 
    221 S.E.2d 773
    , 775 (1976) (holding in an appeal of an action in
    equity, tried by the judge alone, the appellate court has jurisdiction to find facts in
    accordance with its views of the preponderance of the evidence); Blackwell v. State
    Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 
    237 S.C. 649
    , 653, 
    118 S.E.2d 701
    , 704 (1961) ("It is
    well settled that if the mortgagor is bound by covenant in the mortgage or
    otherwise to insure the mortgaged premises for the better security of the
    mortgagee, the latter will have an equitable lien upon the money due on a policy
    taken out by the mortgagor to the extent of the mortgagee's interest in the property
    damaged or destroyed."); Jones v. Equicredit Corp. of S.C., 
    347 S.C. 535
    , 543-44,
    
    556 S.E.2d 713
    , 717-18 (Ct. App. 2001) (stating when a foreclosure sale does not
    satisfy the mortgage debt, the mortgagee is entitled to collect insurance proceeds if
    the unpaid amount of the mortgage is in excess of the insurance proceeds).
    AFFIRMED.
    FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2016-UP-067

Filed Date: 2/17/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024