State v. Cunningham ( 2011 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Clifford Cunningham, Appellant.

---

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

---

 Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-444
Submitted October 1, 2011 – Filed October 11, 2011 

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  James Clifford Cunningham appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking probation because the incident for which he was placed on probation occurred nearly ten years prior.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.