Ravenell v. Meyer ( 2011 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

A. Leon Ravenell, Respondent,

v.

Nancy J. Meyer, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Berkeley County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-590
Submitted December 1, 2011 – Filed December 21, 2011   

---

AFFIRMED

---

Nancy J. Meyer, pro se, of Goose Creek.

George J. Morris, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  In this debt collection action, Nancy J. Meyer appeals the trial court's order dismissing her counterclaim and granting A. Leon Ravenell's motion for an involuntary nonsuit.  Meyer argues the trial court erred in determining the statute of limitations on her counterclaim began to run in August 2005 and in failing to set-off the judgment rendered against her according to her partnership agreement terms.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Rule 208(b)(1)(D), SCACR (requiring arguments in appellate briefs to have citations to legal authority); First Sav. Bank v. McLean, 314 S.C. 361, 363, 444 S.E.2d 513, 514 (1994) (finding an argument without supporting authority abandoned on appeal).    

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.