State v. Ard ( 2016 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Stewart Randall Ard, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-001463
Appeal From Richland County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-243
Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed June 1, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
and Solicitor Daniel Edward Johnson, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, A.C.J., and WILLIAMS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.