Brailsford v. SCDPPPS ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    Ikeef Brailsford, Appellant,
    v.
    South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and
    Pardon Services, Respondent.
    Appellate Case No. 2014-002640
    Appeal From The Administrative Law Court
    S. Phillip Lenski, Administrative Law Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-240
    Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed June 1, 2016
    AFFIRMED
    Ikeef Brailsford, pro se.
    Assistant General Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., of the
    South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and
    Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
    authorities: Rowe v. Hyatt, 
    321 S.C. 366
    , 369, 
    468 S.E.2d 649
    , 650 (1996) ("In
    interpreting a statute, words must be given their plain and ordinary meaning
    without resorting to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand the statute's
    operation."); 
    S.C. Code Ann. § 16-1-90
    (A) (Supp. 2015) (stating distribution of
    crack cocaine, third or subsequent offense, is a Class A felony); 
    S.C. Code Ann. § 24-13-100
     (2007) ("[A] 'no parole offense' means a class A, B, or C felony . . .
    which is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment for twenty years or
    more."); 
    S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-375
    (B) (Supp. 2015) ("Notwithstanding any
    other provision of law, a person convicted and sentenced pursuant to this
    subsection for a third or subsequent offense in which all prior offenses were for
    possession of a controlled substance pursuant to subsection (A), may have the
    sentence suspended and probation granted and is eligible for parole, supervised
    furlough, community supervision, work release, work credits, education credits,
    and good conduct credits. In all other cases, the sentence must not be suspended
    nor probation granted.").
    AFFIRMED.1
    HUFF, A.C.J., and WILLIAMS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2016-UP-240

Filed Date: 6/1/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024