-
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of AppealsSouth Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Amy E. R., Gilbert R., and Angus C., Defendants,
Of whom Amy E. R. is the, Appellant.
In the interest of three minor children under the age of 18.
Appeal From Greenville County
Robert N. Jenkins, Sr., Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-053
Submitted January 3, 2012 Filed January 26, 2012
AFFIRMED
Jonathan Ashley Neal and Thomas J. Quinn, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Deborah Murdock, of Mauldin, for Respondent.
Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Amy E. R. appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.[1]
FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Document Info
Docket Number: 2012-UP-053
Filed Date: 1/26/2012
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/22/2024