State v. Workman ( 2012 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth  M. Workman, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Greenville County
C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-048
Submitted January 3, 2012 – Filed January 25, 2012 

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Kenneth Workman appeals his conviction for armed robbery, possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, conspiracy, and assault and battery.  In his Anders brief, Workman argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the victim's identification and erred in preventing him from questioning the State's witness about the sentence he received on cross-examination.  Additionally, Workman filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.