Rednour v. Rednour ( 2012 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Michael Anthony Rednour, Robert Ray Rednour, Bradford James Rednour, Rodney Jay Rednour, and Nancy Davis Rednour, Respondents,

v.

Catherine Grigg Rednour, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Cherokee County
J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-021 
Submitted January 3, 2012 – Filed January 25, 2012

---

AFFIRMED

---

J. Edwin McDonnell, of Spartanburg, for Appellant.

Michael Dean Hamrick, of Spartanburg, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM: Catherine Grigg Rednour (Wife) appeals the trial court's finding of ouster and award of fair use rental value to Michael Anthony Rednour, Robert Ray Rednour, Bradford James Rednour, Rodney Jay Rednour, and Nancy Davis Rednour (collectively Children).  Wife argues the trial court erred in finding ouster because the only evidence presented was her exclusive possession of the property. Furthermore, Wife argues the trial court erred in awarding rental value when the partitioned property was never income producing.  Wife failed to appeal the trial court's additional ruling that "[e]ven if ouster had not occurred, equity would require compensation to the [Children] for the loss of use of the residence due to [Wife's] exclusive usage of the house since 2001."  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  Jones v. Lott, 387 S.C. 339, 346, 692 S.E.2d 900, 903 (2010) ("Under the two issue rule, where a decision is based on more than one ground, the appellate court will affirm unless the appellant appeals all grounds because the unappealed ground will become the law of the case." (citing Anderson v. Short, 323 S.C. 522, 525, 476 S.E.2d 475, 477 (1996))).

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.