State v. Lucas ( 2012 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Steve Lucas, Appellant.

---

Appeal from Lancaster County
William Jeffrey Young, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-339
Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed May 30, 2012 

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Steve Lucas appeals the circuit court's order revoking his probation, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion in revoking his probation when he was unable to secure admission in an in-patient treatment program.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.