State v. Brogdon ( 2012 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Alexander Brogdon, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-282
Submitted April 2, 2012 - Filed May 9, 2012

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Michael Alexander Brogdon appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion in revoking his probation because he needed drug addiction treatment rather than a prison sentence. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.^[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.