State v. Thomas ( 2016 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Clarence Keith Thomas, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002508
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-467
Submitted October 1, 2016 – Filed November 9, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and
Clarence Keith Thomas, pro se, for Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, South Carolina
Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.