Rose v. Rose ( 2016 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Paula Rose, Respondent,
v.
Charles Homer Rose, III, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-000701
Appeal From Spartanburg County
R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-452
Submitted September 1, 2016 – Filed November 9, 2016
AFFIRMED
Kim R. Varner, of Varner & Segura, and J. Falkner
Wilkes, both of Greenville, for Appellant.
Charles J. Hodge and Timothy Ryan Langley, of Hodge
& Langley Law Firm, PC; and Christopher David
Kennedy and N. Douglas Brannon, of Kennedy &
Brannon, P.A., all of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Roberson v. S. Fin. of S.C., Inc., 365 S.C. 6, 9, 615 S.E.2d 112, 114
(2005) ("The decision whether to set aside an entry of default or a default judgment
lies solely within the sound discretion of the [circuit court]."); id. ("The [circuit]
court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of an abuse
of that discretion."); id. ("An abuse of discretion in setting aside a default judgment
occurs when the [court] issuing the order was controlled by some error of law or
when the order, based upon factual, as distinguished from legal conclusions, is
without evidentiary support." (quoting In re Estate of Weeks, 329 S.C. 251, 259,
495 S.E.2d 454, 459 (Ct. App. 1997))).
AFFIRMED.1
LOCKEMY, C.J., and SHORT, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.